What is Acoustic Micro Imaging? A Quick Guide to this Inspection Process

What is Acoustic Micro Imaging? A Quick Guide to this Inspection Process

Nordson Test & Inspection
跳转到博客内容
MicrosoftTeams-image (7).png

We all know how important inspection is for advanced packaging. Not only are these processes critical for ensuring higher yield, but they’re also integral for maintaining device reliability. As the industry pushes for smaller features and tighter spacing, even the smallest defects can pose major challenges. For instance, delaminations and air gaps can be detrimental in a market that demands increasingly complex devices. Such defects will lead to electrical or mechanical failures down the road.

 

One technology that’s mitigating these issues is acoustic micro imaging (AMI). AMI is a high-frequency ultrasound technology, and it’s being used by the industry as an inspection method.

 

 

How AMI Works

 

To learn more about AMI and its role in advanced packaging, I spoke with Rebecca McCordic, senior application engineer at Nordson Test & Inspection.

 

McCordic explained that at the core of AMI technology is a transducer, or a device that turns energy from one form to another. It starts with a pulse of electrical energy, then converts it to mechanical energy, or a high-frequency ultrasound wave. Because ultrasound doesn’t travel through air, this allows inspectors to obtain clear images of gaps and delaminations in the device that could otherwise be difficult to see.

 

However, the transducers used for AMI are not all the same. Each transducer handles a specific frequency, and they’re chosen based on the sample that needs to be inspected. By moving the transducer across the sample, the inspector can generate multiple images that can then be analyzed by the AMI software. Through this analysis, the inspector can choose to accept or reject parts based on the number of defects the package is found to have.

 

 

Image GUI Map 15.png

 

 

So, how do these defects typically present themselves?

 

The biggest difference between ideal and defective samples, McCordic shared, is that some defective samples will have very clear air gaps. However, another common defect McCordic noted is thinning of the attach material on solder pads. When this material is too thin, any stress that would be put on the device could lead to delamination. An uneven solder or thermal interface material (TIM) layer may also indicate a larger problem with the build process.

 

 

When to Use AMI – Inspection, Destructive Testing, and X-rays

 

With the ability to gather so much information without damaging the device, I also asked McCordic why anyone would choose to perform a destructive test to identify a defect, rather than simply use AMI inspection to check for them. One reason, she explained, is for R&D purposes. Oftentimes, companies want to ensure that a process is fully developed before integrating it into their production cycle, and a destructive test can confirm proof of concept for AMI.

 

An example of this in action is a standard capacitor inspection. New capacitor companies will often require a destructive test to confirm the presence of voids or delaminations found by the AMI software. Once the destructive, proof of concept has been completed, the company can then integrate the software into their inspection process.

 

McCordic also highlighted some of the key differences between AMI and its transmission technology counterpart, which is more comparable to X-ray. Whereas AMI is an ultrasound technology, transmission scanning uses both a sending and receiving transducer positioned above and below the sample. Both transmission technology and X-ray create composite images, unlike AMI, which inspects layer-by-layer.

 

“Ultrasound and X-ray are complementary technologies,” said McCordic. “There are some things AMI can do that X-ray can’t, and vice versa.”

 

For certain applications, McCordic noted that both technologies may be recommended. For example, composite images are preferable for inspecting spherical objects like ball grid arrays.

 

 

The Challenges and Future of AMI

 

Although AMI technology has tangible benefits, keeping up with the industry’s rapid pace is a hurdle that AMI must continually overcome. As applications become more complex, AMI software needs to quickly adapt to changing components. For instance, instead of scanning a single flip chip, AMI software could now be required to inspect multi-die stacks.

 

One way this mounting complexity is being addressed is through machine learning algorithms.

 

For example, some wafers have via patterns that look similar or identical to delamination, and humans have typically been responsible for distinguishing them. However, McCordic explained that through advancements in machine learning, AMI software can now identify via patterns and exclude those from the defect count. As machine learning becomes more robust, it will open new doors for inspecting increasingly complicated devices.

 

In addition, customer requirements for higher resolution and better throughput are also driving new developments for AMI software. To meet these rising demands, Nordson Test & Inspection developed its automated SpinSAM tool that can inspect four, 300mm wafers at a time.

 

 

SpinSAM_Foups_White.jpg

   

“The wafer motion itself is revolutionary, because we’re spinning the wafers to get a higher throughput,” said McCordic. “It’s a huge improvement over systems from the past.”

 

Traditionally, acoustic microscopy systems move the transducer in a raster pattern, which is a small grid made up of individual pixels. This approach allows inspectors to collect data at every XY point, but it also requires decelerating to turn the transducer at the end of each line, thereby reducing throughput. Some acoustic microscopes address the need for better throughput by skipping lines and interpolating data points, or by using multiple transducers and stitching images together – both of which have their own drawbacks.

 

In contrast, SpinSAM spins the wafer to move the transducer and the wafer continuously, allowing inspectors to scan each pixel faster, allowing for better throughput without image stitching distortion.

 

Learn more about Nordson Test & Inspection and its new AMI SpinSAM solution.

   

Check out these other stories to learn more about Acoustic Micro Imaging (AMI) Technology:

 

检测和计量设备

我们的检测和计量设备在全球得到广泛认可。以下是我们的一些经过验证的世界级非破坏性解决方案。

AMI SpinSAM - Scanning - Acoustic - Microscopy

Industry leading throughput on four 300mm wafer inspection Best in class footprint / UPH Leading defect capture and...

了解更多

用于 3D AOI、SPI 和 CMM 的多功能 SQ7000+TM

SQ7000+ 多功能系统采用 Multi-Reflection Suppression® (MRS®) 传感器技术,具有高分辨率、高精度和高速检测与计量功能,是市场上唯一能够在线执行 AOI、SPI 和 CMM 的系统。

了解更多

AXI XS 系列

超高分辨率在线 AXI 平台 3D 检测揭示了诺信零缺陷战略的惊人细节。 Dynamic Planar CT 是下一代 3D 平面 X 射线检测的卓越软件,它将 AXI 提升到了一个新的水平。

了解更多

MXI QUADRA™ 7 Pro

Quadra™ Pro 系列 可生成无与伦比的超高清图像。内部设计的高性能双模式 NT4 X 光管和 Onyx 检测器可让您看到最微小的细节,并立即发现缺陷。一切清晰立现。

了解更多

 X 平面系统选项

X-Plane 技术可在电路板上的任何位置提供高分辨率、高放大倍率的 CT 功能 - 无需切割电路板。

了解更多

SQ3000 平方米

卓越的性能,非常适合引线键合应用。 SQ3000M2 自动光学检测 (AOI) 确保产品质量达到最大化。 提高产量、流程和生产力并减少现场昂贵的回报。

了解更多

WaferSense® Auto Gapping System 2™ (AGS2)

无线晶圆传感 WaferSense® AGS2 精准设置,提升均匀性与良率。

了解更多

AMI Gen7

新一代 C-SAM 技术。 最先进、功能齐全的 C-SAM 声学显微镜,适用于实验室分析和专业高分辨率应用。

了解更多

WaferSense® Auto Teaching System™ (ATS2)

采集三维偏移数据(x、y 和 z)以快速提供晶圆传输位置指示。

了解更多

Assure 点料机

在正确的时间、正确的地点以正确的数量提供正确的材料。 世界上最先推出的X 光点料机Assure™ 确保您的生产可连续运行,实现经济效益。

了解更多

4000 Plus 焊接强度测试仪

4000Plus 焊接强度测试仪设定了焊接强度测试的行业标准,提供无与伦比的数据准确性和可重复性,让您对结果充满信心。

了解更多

003 系列体积计量阀 | 诺信

003 系列体积计量阀是一种容积式计量阀,可自动分配少量、精确测量的材料注射量。

了解更多

博客

深入了解诺信测试与检测解决方案,获取行业洞察,探索前沿测量检测技术

带我去智库博客