What is Acoustic Micro Imaging? A Quick Guide to this Inspection Process

What is Acoustic Micro Imaging? A Quick Guide to this Inspection Process

Nordson Test & Inspection
블로그 콘텐츠로 이동
MicrosoftTeams-image (7).png

We all know how important inspection is for advanced packaging. Not only are these processes critical for ensuring higher yield, but they’re also integral for maintaining device reliability. As the industry pushes for smaller features and tighter spacing, even the smallest defects can pose major challenges. For instance, delaminations and air gaps can be detrimental in a market that demands increasingly complex devices. Such defects will lead to electrical or mechanical failures down the road.

 

One technology that’s mitigating these issues is acoustic micro imaging (AMI). AMI is a high-frequency ultrasound technology, and it’s being used by the industry as an inspection method.

 

 

How AMI Works

 

To learn more about AMI and its role in advanced packaging, I spoke with Rebecca McCordic, senior application engineer at Nordson Test & Inspection.

 

McCordic explained that at the core of AMI technology is a transducer, or a device that turns energy from one form to another. It starts with a pulse of electrical energy, then converts it to mechanical energy, or a high-frequency ultrasound wave. Because ultrasound doesn’t travel through air, this allows inspectors to obtain clear images of gaps and delaminations in the device that could otherwise be difficult to see.

 

However, the transducers used for AMI are not all the same. Each transducer handles a specific frequency, and they’re chosen based on the sample that needs to be inspected. By moving the transducer across the sample, the inspector can generate multiple images that can then be analyzed by the AMI software. Through this analysis, the inspector can choose to accept or reject parts based on the number of defects the package is found to have.

 

 

Image GUI Map 15.png

 

 

So, how do these defects typically present themselves?

 

The biggest difference between ideal and defective samples, McCordic shared, is that some defective samples will have very clear air gaps. However, another common defect McCordic noted is thinning of the attach material on solder pads. When this material is too thin, any stress that would be put on the device could lead to delamination. An uneven solder or thermal interface material (TIM) layer may also indicate a larger problem with the build process.

 

 

When to Use AMI – Inspection, Destructive Testing, and X-rays

 

With the ability to gather so much information without damaging the device, I also asked McCordic why anyone would choose to perform a destructive test to identify a defect, rather than simply use AMI inspection to check for them. One reason, she explained, is for R&D purposes. Oftentimes, companies want to ensure that a process is fully developed before integrating it into their production cycle, and a destructive test can confirm proof of concept for AMI.

 

An example of this in action is a standard capacitor inspection. New capacitor companies will often require a destructive test to confirm the presence of voids or delaminations found by the AMI software. Once the destructive, proof of concept has been completed, the company can then integrate the software into their inspection process.

 

McCordic also highlighted some of the key differences between AMI and its transmission technology counterpart, which is more comparable to X-ray. Whereas AMI is an ultrasound technology, transmission scanning uses both a sending and receiving transducer positioned above and below the sample. Both transmission technology and X-ray create composite images, unlike AMI, which inspects layer-by-layer.

 

“Ultrasound and X-ray are complementary technologies,” said McCordic. “There are some things AMI can do that X-ray can’t, and vice versa.”

 

For certain applications, McCordic noted that both technologies may be recommended. For example, composite images are preferable for inspecting spherical objects like ball grid arrays.

 

 

The Challenges and Future of AMI

 

Although AMI technology has tangible benefits, keeping up with the industry’s rapid pace is a hurdle that AMI must continually overcome. As applications become more complex, AMI software needs to quickly adapt to changing components. For instance, instead of scanning a single flip chip, AMI software could now be required to inspect multi-die stacks.

 

One way this mounting complexity is being addressed is through machine learning algorithms.

 

For example, some wafers have via patterns that look similar or identical to delamination, and humans have typically been responsible for distinguishing them. However, McCordic explained that through advancements in machine learning, AMI software can now identify via patterns and exclude those from the defect count. As machine learning becomes more robust, it will open new doors for inspecting increasingly complicated devices.

 

In addition, customer requirements for higher resolution and better throughput are also driving new developments for AMI software. To meet these rising demands, Nordson Test & Inspection developed its automated SpinSAM tool that can inspect four, 300mm wafers at a time.

 

 

SpinSAM_Foups_White.jpg

   

“The wafer motion itself is revolutionary, because we’re spinning the wafers to get a higher throughput,” said McCordic. “It’s a huge improvement over systems from the past.”

 

Traditionally, acoustic microscopy systems move the transducer in a raster pattern, which is a small grid made up of individual pixels. This approach allows inspectors to collect data at every XY point, but it also requires decelerating to turn the transducer at the end of each line, thereby reducing throughput. Some acoustic microscopes address the need for better throughput by skipping lines and interpolating data points, or by using multiple transducers and stitching images together – both of which have their own drawbacks.

 

In contrast, SpinSAM spins the wafer to move the transducer and the wafer continuously, allowing inspectors to scan each pixel faster, allowing for better throughput without image stitching distortion.

 

Learn more about Nordson Test & Inspection and its new AMI SpinSAM solution.

   

Check out these other stories to learn more about Acoustic Micro Imaging (AMI) Technology:

 

검사 및 계측 장비

소니의 검사 및 계측 장비는 전 세계적으로 널리 인정받고 있습니다. 아래에서 입증된 세계 최고 수준의 비파괴 솔루션 몇 가지를 확인해 보십시오.

003 시리즈 용적 측정 밸브 | 노드슨

003 시리즈 볼륨 미터링 밸브는 소량의 정밀하게 측정된 재료의 샷 볼륨을 자동으로 분배하는 용적식 미터 밸브입니다.

더 알아보기

ASYMTEK DV-01 주사기 밸브

DV‑01은 신속한 설치와 직관적인 작동을 위해 설계된 간편한 타임-프레스어 밸브입니다. 이 제품은 정밀 디스펜싱과 콘포멀 코팅 작업 모두를 지원할 수 있는 유연성을 바탕으로 안정적인 성능을 제공합니다. 새로운...

더 알아보기

Suckback이 있는 ASYMTEK DV-05A 다이어프램 밸브

ASYMTEK DV-05A 다이어프램 밸브는 다양한 응용 분야에서 중점도부터 중고점도 유체에 대해 일관되고 정밀한 디스펜싱 성능을 제공합니다. 내구성, 유연성 및 제어력을 고려하여 설계된 이 제품은 유지보수 및...

더 알아보기

ASYMTEK DV-07 조정 가능한 액체 계량 밸브

ASYMTEK DV-07 가변형 액체 계량 밸브를 사용하면 부식성이 강한 화학 물질에서도 정확하고 재현성 높은 액체 분사가 가능합니다. 정밀성과 내구성을 고려해 설계된 이 고성능 공압식 다이어프램 밸브는 까다로운...

더 알아보기

ASYMTEK DV-09 니들 밸브

개스킷용 또는 매우 가는 선을 그리는 데 사용되는 저점도 유체의 정밀 도포.

더 알아보기

고급 유도 BR-1 컨트롤러

BR-1 컨트롤러는 Nordson 고급 인덕션 건조기 및 살균기를 위해 손쉬운 개장과 향상된 기능을 제공하는 고급 인덕션 컨트롤러입니다.

더 알아보기

1액형 팁 씰 밸브

1K 팁 씰 밸브 시리즈는 단일 테이퍼 형상 스템 및 시트, 1액형 재료 분배용 공기 작동 밸브입니다.

더 알아보기

1액형 스너프박 밸브

1K Snuf-Bak 밸브는 1성분 재료를 분배하기 위한 단일 스풀, 역 피스톤 작동 재료 밸브입니다.

더 알아보기

1액형 노드립 밸브

1K 노드립 밸브 시리즈는 1액형 재료 디스펜싱을 위한 단일 볼 및 시트, 피스톤 작동 밸브입니다.

더 알아보기

SELECT 체르노 508.1

Cerno® 508.1은 유연성, 처리량 및 대형 기판 처리를 최적화하는 강력한 선택적 납땜 시스템입니다.

더 알아보기

싱크탱크 블로그로 이동